led forthwith to the demolition of Thomism and Scotism alike. explicitly propounded a new epistemology, and it was this aspect of his work that exploded, as it were, and changed the whole landscape of contemporary thought by denying to the philosopher all right to any knowledge of the extra-mental universe save the intuitive knowledge of individual things, each of which was so irreducibly individual as to be unsusceptible of any intelligible relationship or connection with any other individual. Thomas Aquinas and Duns Scotusįrom: David Knowles (U), The Evolution of Medieval Thought, New York: Vintage Books, 1962, 308-309, 327-328, 340.ĭuns is in no direct sense the ancestor of Ockhamism, and his followers have in the sequel arrested any tendency towards Nominalism in their school by combining the theological systems of Bonaventure and Scotus. Ockham and Nominalism Compared to the Scholastic Systems of St. Ockham was a Franciscan and a theologian: he should not be interpreted as though he were a modern radical empiricist. His activity as a logician and his attack on all forms of realism in regard to universals can thus be looked on as subordinate in a sense to his preoccupations as a Christian theologian. one of Ockham’s main preoccupations as a philosopher was to purge Christian theology and philosophy of all traces of Greek necessitarianism, particularly of the theory of essences, which in his opinion endangered the Christian doctrines of the divine liberty and omnipotence. Ockham was an independent, bold and vigorous thinker, who showed a marked ability for criticism he held certain clear convictions and principles which he was ready to apply courageously, systematically and logically. ![]() There is no adequate reason for challenging his reputation as the fountainhead of the terminalist or nominalist movement. Albert the Great and Roger Bacon we find a combination of the spiritual outlook with an interest in the empirical study of nature. was not radically hostile to the study of the world and in the case of thirteenth-century philosophers like St. We have only to think of men like Albert the Great, Peter of Maricourt and Roger Bacon. Already in the thirteenth century interest had been taken in the Latin translations of Greek and Arabic scientific works, and original observations and experiments had been made. one is not justified in asserting without qualification that a rudimentary appreciation of physical science was peculiar to the fourteenth century, as contrasted with the thirteenth, or that the scientific studies associated withy the Ockhamist movement were the direct progenitors of Renaissance science. The nominalist movement possessed a significance and an importance which cannot be adequately expressed by reference to one particular controversy. It would, however, be a grossly inadequate description if one contented oneself with saying that the fourteenth-century nominalists attacked the realism of the thirteenth-century philosophers. ![]() It is true that they strongly opposed and criticized the realism of earlier philosophers, particularly that of Duns Scotus but it would be an over-simplification of their anti-realism to say that it consisted in attributing universality to ‘names’ or words alone. ![]() This appellation is in some respects not very apposite, since William of Ockham, for example, did not deny that there are universal concepts in some sense. ![]() The thinkers of this new movement, the via moderna, which naturally possessed all the charm of ‘modernity’, opposed the realism of the earlier schools and became known as the ‘nominalists’. there arose and spread in the fourteenth century a new movement, associated for ever with the name of William of Ockham. 3: Late Mediaeval and Renaissance Philosophy, Part I: Ockham to the Speculative Mystics, Garden City, New York: Doubleday Image, 1953, 21, 26, 30, 59-60. Introduction to Medieval Philosophical Nominalism and William of Ockhamįrom: Frederick Copleston, S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |